AMD Marketing claims Radeon RX 6000 GPUs offer better performance per dollar and higher FPS per watt compared to NVIDIA’s RTX 30 series

In a new marketing slide released by AMD, the company says its Radeon RX 6000 GPUs lead in price and efficiency over NVIDIA’s RTX 30 series.

AMD Radeon RX 6000 GPUs Offer Better Value and Efficiency Over NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 30 Series, Claims Red Team

The slide in question was tweeted by AMD’s Chief Gaming Architect, Frank Azor, who presents both the performance per watt and performance per dollar of AMD’s entire Radeon RX 6000 lineup compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX series 30. The GPU list includes everything from the fastest AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT to the entry-level Radeon RX 6400.

AMD Flagship RDNA 3 Navi 31 GPU reportedly codenamed ‘Plum Bonito’ and uses ‘Gemini’ board, new generation RDNA 4 may land as ‘GFX1200’ series

AMD used the cards’ list prices for comparison purposes and not the MSRPs. Based on the metrics, the AMD Radeon RX 6000 series lineup offers:

  • RX 6950 XT versus RTX 3090: 80% higher FPS/$ ($1,100 vs. $1,700)
  • RX 6900 XT versus RTX 3080 Ti: 19% higher FPS/$ ($1,000 vs. $1,170)
  • RX 6800 XT versus RTX 3080: 6% more FPS/$ ($850 vs. $850)
  • RX 6800 vs. RTX 3070 Ti: 8% more FPS/$ ($759 vs. $750)
  • RX 6750 XT versus RTX 3070: 33% more FPS/$ ($550 vs. $700)
  • RX 6700 XT versus RTX 3060 Ti: 30% higher FPS/$ ($490 vs. $580)
  • RX 6650 XT versus RTX 3060: 54% higher FPS/$ ($400 vs. $430)
  • RX 6600 versus RTX 3050: 40% higher FPS/$ ($330 vs. $330)
  • RX 6500 XT versus GTX 1650: 19% higher FPS/$ (199 vs. $190)
  • RX 6400 versus GTX 1050 Ti: 89% higher FPS/$ ($160 vs. $192)

AMD claimed up to 89% better performance per watt when comparing its new RDNA 2 Radeon RX 6400 graphics card to a years-old GTX 1050 Ti graphics card. The second biggest boost comes from the recently released flagship, the RX 6950 XT, which offers an 80% boost over its RTX competitor, the GeForce RTX 3090, with an 80% higher value. That said, AMD has also shared the performance per watt of its Radeon RX 6000 line, which can be seen below:

  • RX 6950 XT versus RTX 3090: 22% higher FPS/Watt (335W vs. 350W)
  • RX 6900 XT versus RTX 3080 Ti: 19% higher FPS/Watt (300W vs. 350W)
  • RX 6800 XT versus RTX 3080: 21% higher FPS/Watt (280W vs. 320W)
  • RX 6800 vs. RTX 3070 Ti: 27% higher FPS/Watt (250W vs. 290W)
  • RX 6750 XT versus RTX 3070: Similar FPS/Watt (250W vs 220W)
  • RX 6700 XT versus RTX 3060 Ti: 10% higher FPS/Watt (230W vs. 200W)
  • RX 6650 XT versus RTX 3060: 35% higher FPS/Watt (180W vs. 170W)
  • RX 6600 versus RTX 3050: 38% higher FPS/Watt (132W vs. 130W)
  • RX 6500 XT versus GTX 1650: Similar FPS/Watt (107W vs. 75W)
  • RX 6400 versus GTX 1050 Ti: 123% higher FPS/Watt (53W vs. 75W)

AMD also lists each specific level of game these cards are intended for. Navi 24 offerings such as the Radeon RX 6500 XT and RX 6400 are for 1080p Medium gaming, Navi 23 offerings are designed for 1080p Max, Navi 22 offerings which include the RX 6700 series are designed for 2K Max while Navi 21 aims for the 4K maxed segment.

Once again, prices are at their lowest as seen at Newegg on May 10, 2022. With ever-changing prices, this chart may soon become invalid, but it looks like AMD and NVIDIA are aware of the fact that with prices dropping and availability improving, gamers will now be looking for a new solution for their PC and both companies are doing their best with marketing and promotions to entice gamers to purchase their graphics cards from the current generation. AMD and NVIDIA have already been marketing around the availability of these cards and the red team also recently announced the full relaunch of their “Raise The Game” bundle.

AMD Radeon RX 6000 series “RDNA 2” line of graphics cards:

Graphic card AMD Radeon RX 6950XT AMD Radeon RX 6900XT AMD Radeon RX 6800XT AMD Radeon RX6800 AMD Radeon RX 6750XT AMD Radeon RX 6700XT AMD Radeon RX 6650XT AMD Radeon RX 6600XT AMD Radeon RX6600 AMD Radeon RX 6500XT AMD Radeon RX6400
GPUs Navi 21 KXTX Navi 21 XTX Navi 21 XT Navi 21 XL Navi 22 KXT Navi 22 XT Navi 23 KXT Navi 23 (XT) Navi 23 (XL) Navi 24 (XT) Navi 24 (XL)
Process node 7nm 7nm 7nm 7nm 7nm 7nm 7nm 7nm 7nm 6nm 6nm
Die size 520mm2 520mm2 520mm2 520mm2 336mm2 336mm2 237mm2 237mm2 237mm2 107mm2 107mm2
Transistors 26.8 billion 26.8 billion 26.8 billion 26.8 billion 17.2 billion 17.2 billion 11.06 billion 11.06 billion 11.06 billion 5.4 billion 5.4 billion
Calculation units 80 80 72 60 40 40 32 32 28 16 12
Stream processors 5120 5120 4608 3840 2560 2560 2048 2048 1792 1024 768
TMU/ROP 320 / 128 320 / 128 288 / 128 240 / 96 160/64 160/64 128/64 128/64 112/64 64/32 48/32
game clock 2116MHz 2015MHz 2015MHz 1815MHz 2495MHz 2424MHz 2410MHz 2359MHz 2044MHz 2610MHz 2039MHz
Boost clock 2324MHz 2250MHz 2250MHz 2105MHz 2600MHz 2581MHz 2635MHz 2589MHz 2491MHz 2815MHz 2321MHz
TFLOP FP32 23.80 TFLOPs 23.04 TFLOPs 20.74 TFLOPs 16.17 TFLOPs 13.31 TFLOPs 13.21 TFLOPs 10.79 TFLOPs 10.6 TFLOPs 9.0 TFLOPs 5.7 TFLOPs 3.5 TFLOPs
Memory size 16GB GDDR6 + 128MB Infinity Cache 16GB GDDR6 + 128MB Infinity Cache 16GB GDDR6 + 128MB Infinity Cache 16GB GDDR6 + 128MB Infinity Cache 12GB GDDR6 + 96MB Infinity Cache 12GB GDDR6 + 96MB Infinity Cache 8GB GDDR6 + 32MB Infinity Cache 8GB GDDR6 + 32MB Infinity Cache 8GB GDDR6 + 32MB Infinity Cache 4GB GDDR6 + 16MB Infinity Cache 4GB GDDR6 + 16MB Infinity Cache
Memory bus 256 bit 256 bit 256 bit 256 bit 192 bit 192 bit 128 bit 128 bit 128 bit 64 bit 64 bit
Memory clock 18 Gbps 16 Gbps 16 Gbps 16 Gbps 18 Gbps 16 Gbps 17.5 Gbps 16 Gbps 14 Gbps 18 Gbps 14 Gbps
Bandwidth 576 GB/s 512 GB/s 512 GB/s 512 GB/s 432 GB/s 384 GB/s 280 GB/s 256 GB/s 224 GB/s 144 GB/s 112 GB/s
PDT 335W 300W 300W 250W 250W 230W 176W 160W 132W 107W 53W
Price US$1099 US$999 US$649 US$579 US$549 US$479 US$399 US$379 US$329 US$199 US$159?

News Source: Videocardz


#AMD #Marketing #claims #Radeon #GPUs #offer #performance #dollar #higher #FPS #watt #compared #NVIDIAs #RTX #series